Top physicists speak out against Bush Administration policies in the war on terror.

physgbay.jpg Credit: Thomas Pullicino

On April 17, 2006, Seymour Hersh reported in The New Yorker that the United States had tabled plans to employ tactical nuclear weapons against Iran to halt their burgeoning nuclear program. A letter had been sent to President Bush that same day, condemning what its authors worried would be a radical departure from the official US nuclear weapons policy of “only as a last resort.”

The 19 signatories of the document were neither weapons experts nor policy wonks; rather, all were physicists, “members of the profession that brought nuclear weapons into existence.” These individuals, including six Nobel laureates, were asserting the parental rights to their brainchild as Oppenheimer, Einstein and others had once done after WWII. 

The nation’s physicists, whether the government cares to acknowledge them or not, are increasingly willing to speak out on the “moral consequences” of the Bush Administration’s hawkish maneuvers. In the past year, 1,800 physicists have attached their names to another letter denouncing the use of nuclear weapons as a general policy. This past week, the American Physical Society, representing some 45,000 physicists from around the globe, joined the chorus by noting that the use of “nuclear weapons against non-nuclear weapon states threatens to undermine the Non-Proliferation Treaty.” In their statement, they further called for policy makers to “engage in a dialog with scientists.”

Beyond protecting their baby, a letter to the editor appeared in this past Sunday’s New York Times that indicates that the purview of physicists’ critiques of governmental injustice is growing.

“As scientists, we claim no special role in public policy,” said Freeman Dyson of the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, NJ, regarding the physicists’ most recent letter. “But, there is a long tradition of scientists being concerned with wider issues and bravely speaking out against injustice. The fact that science is an international enterprise helps scientists to take a critical view of their own governments.” 

Dyson was among 19 physicists, including four Nobel Prize winners, who voiced their disgust with the treatment of enemy combatants at clandestine detention centers such as the facility at Guantanamo Bay. The letter outlines both the frequent legal and moral objections to detaining prisoners without trial, but also stipulates another reason physicists are speaking out on the US government’s actions: the scientist’s responsibility to truth.

“I think everyone should be concerned that the US, without even a real debate, has abandoned our historic principles and values,” said Edward Witten, a Fields Medal winner and one of the signatories. Witten is also a former political aspirant and worked on a presidential campaign in the 1960s.

Despite the respect often accorded to the field, some policy analysts believe that scientists have no special claim to truth saying.

“Lawyers, novelists, doctors, salespeople, accountants and airline pilots, among many others (politicians included!!), have a responsibility to the truth, too,” said Daniel Sarewitz, the director of the Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes at Arizona State University via e-mail. “Perhaps this particular group of scientists is particularly thoughtful and insightful and deserving of being attended to—but that seems independent of the fact that they are scientists.”

Others feel physicists should not be mortgaging their societal status by peddling their politics. 

“By trading on their authority, [physicists] risk making science seem just like any other basis of power—money, fame, etc.,” said Roger Pielke, Jr., director of the Center for Science and Technology Policy Research at the University of Colorado. “If we believe that science has some special characteristics—like being a useful path to reliable knowledge. Treating it like any other basis of authority carries some risks for that specialness.” 

However, these physicists do not explicitly claim that science has all the answers to US foreign policy or that they are unique purveyors of truth.

“We are human beings first and scientists second,” said Dyson, in response to the letter’s critics. “When I speak about justice for prisoners, I speak as a human being,”

Stanford University physicist Leonard Susskind, who initiated The New York Times editorial, says that a scientist’s opinion matters based on the very nature and history of the profession. 

“During the 20th century there were many cases in which scientists bore the brunt of political and sometimes physical harassment,” Susskind said. “Albert Einstein was a brave and vocal critic of both the Nazi regime and McCarthyism; Neils Bohr was, also. The story of how Andrei Sakharov took on the totalitarian Soviet establishment is well known. This is all part of the history that every physicist knows.

“I myself had a former student imprisoned and threatened for two years during the ‘dirty war’ in Argentina,” he continued. “Because of these connections, many physicists are especially sensitive about the issues of illegal imprisonment and other abuses of power. Thus I felt it was proper to speak out, not just as citizens, but as scientists.”

Download podcast

Originally published May 7, 2006


Share this Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More


  • Ideas

    I Tried Almost Everything Else

    John Rinn, snowboarder, skateboarder, and “genomic origamist,” on why we should dumpster-dive in our genomes and the inspiration of a middle-distance runner.

  • Ideas

    Going, Going, Gone

    The second most common element in the universe is increasingly rare on Earth—except, for now, in America.

  • Ideas

    Earth-like Planets Aren’t Rare

    Renowned planetary scientist James Kasting on the odds of finding another Earth-like planet and the power of science fiction.

The Seed Salon

Video: conversations with leading scientists and thinkers on fundamental issues and ideas at the edge of science and culture.

Are We Beyond the Two Cultures?

Video: Seed revisits the questions C.P. Snow raised about science and the humanities 50 years by asking six great thinkers, Where are we now?

Saved by Science

Audio slideshow: Justine Cooper's large-format photographs of the collections behind the walls of the American Museum of Natural History.

The Universe in 2009

In 2009, we are celebrating curiosity and creativity with a dynamic look at the very best ideas that give us reason for optimism.

Revolutionary Minds
The Interpreters

In this installment of Revolutionary Minds, five people who use the new tools of science to educate, illuminate, and engage.

The Seed Design Series

Leading scientists, designers, and architects on ideas like the personal genome, brain visualization, generative architecture, and collective design.

The Seed State of Science

Seed examines the radical changes within science itself by assessing the evolving role of scientists and the shifting dimensions of scientific practice.

A Place for Science

On the trail of the haunts, homes, and posts of knowledge, from the laboratory to the field.


Witness the science. Stunning photographic portfolios from the pages of Seed magazine.

SEEDMAGAZINE.COM by Seed Media Group. ©2005-2015 Seed Media Group LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | Research Blogging | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM