Economists often use a construct known as “the ultimatum game” in their research: Player one receives an amount of money and must propose a way to split the sum with another player. If player two accepts the offer, both players split the money in the proposed way. If player two rejects the offer, neither player receives any money.

The game essentially pits the desire for personal economic gain against the desire to punish someone else. Although it is financially advantageous for player two to accept any offer—since some money is better than none—previous research indicates that player two will often reject low offers as a way to punish player one for an unfair division of money.

A collaborative study between Swiss economists and a Harvard University neurologist recently identified a part of the brain that cause us to de-prioritize punishing another player in the ultimatum game.

Previous studies using fMRI indicate that a brain region known as the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), which is involved in reasoning, is particularly active when a player was presented with an unfair offer.

The authors of the new study, published Oct. 5 in Science, used a technique called repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to interfere with DLPFC functioning. The relatively new procedure involves applying a magnetic pulse to the scalp, causing a temporary disruption of activity in the brain region underneath. 

Researchers found that subjects with disrupted DLPFC activity were significantly more likely to accept “unfair” offers. Those who received rTMS to the right side of the DLPFC accepted the most unfair offer—$4 out of a possible $20—45 percent of the time. That is compared to a 9 percent acceptance rate among those who received a placebo treatment. (The researchers found that interfering with the function of the left DLPFC had no effect.)

Subjects with disrupted DLPFC activity said they considered low offers unfair, yet frequently chose to accept them anyway.

The neuroeconmic study was the first to show that changing the activity in the DLPFC was sufficient to change people’s economic choices.

“There’s a big difference between correlation and causality,” said Ernst Fehr, an economist at Switzerland’s University of Zurich, a researcher on the study. “We established causality.”

“We can show that it’s DLPFC disruption that leads to the change in behavior,” he added.

The work of Fehr and his colleagues challenges previous studies, which suggest that the DLPFC acted to make people rationally take whatever sum they are offered. Because disrupting the region increased player two’s acceptance of player one’s offers, a normally functioning DLPFC may actually be involved in irrationally punishing player one by rejecting the offer.

“It’s a surprising result,” said Samuel McClure, a psychologist at Princeton. “People had been thinking the opposite.”

Originally published October 5, 2006


Share this Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More


  • Ideas

    I Tried Almost Everything Else

    John Rinn, snowboarder, skateboarder, and “genomic origamist,” on why we should dumpster-dive in our genomes and the inspiration of a middle-distance runner.

  • Ideas

    Going, Going, Gone

    The second most common element in the universe is increasingly rare on Earth—except, for now, in America.

  • Ideas

    Earth-like Planets Aren’t Rare

    Renowned planetary scientist James Kasting on the odds of finding another Earth-like planet and the power of science fiction.

The Seed Salon

Video: conversations with leading scientists and thinkers on fundamental issues and ideas at the edge of science and culture.

Are We Beyond the Two Cultures?

Video: Seed revisits the questions C.P. Snow raised about science and the humanities 50 years by asking six great thinkers, Where are we now?

Saved by Science

Audio slideshow: Justine Cooper's large-format photographs of the collections behind the walls of the American Museum of Natural History.

The Universe in 2009

In 2009, we are celebrating curiosity and creativity with a dynamic look at the very best ideas that give us reason for optimism.

Revolutionary Minds
The Interpreters

In this installment of Revolutionary Minds, five people who use the new tools of science to educate, illuminate, and engage.

The Seed Design Series

Leading scientists, designers, and architects on ideas like the personal genome, brain visualization, generative architecture, and collective design.

The Seed State of Science

Seed examines the radical changes within science itself by assessing the evolving role of scientists and the shifting dimensions of scientific practice.

A Place for Science

On the trail of the haunts, homes, and posts of knowledge, from the laboratory to the field.


Witness the science. Stunning photographic portfolios from the pages of Seed magazine.

SEEDMAGAZINE.COM by Seed Media Group. ©2005-2015 Seed Media Group LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | Research Blogging | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM