Business as Abnormal

Featured Blogger / by Chris Rowan /

The recent flirtation with geoengineering may prove a dangerous distraction from working toward a sustainable future.

I’ve always felt that there’s a certain irony in the suggestion that we can solve our current environmental woes by engaging in deliberate, large-scale manipulation of the Earth’s climate. The warming of our planet is, after all, the result of our first—admittedly unwitting—experiment in “geoengineering,” and I am reminded of situations where a new species is deliberately introduced into an ecosystem to control an invasive pest and ends up causing unexpected problems of its own.

I am therefore glad to see the Royal Society add a healthy measure of realism to the geoengineering debate with their recently published report. As James Wilsdon tells us, it clearly demonstrates that none of the commonly proposed schemes is a magic bullet—a Hollywood-esque reset button for climate change. Some ideas, such as dumping aerosols into the stratosphere to reflect more sunlight back into space, may be effective but are also quite environmentally damaging in their own right; others, such as directly removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere (perhaps using “artificial trees”) are more benign but much more expensive and based on as yet unproven technology. At best, geoengineering should be viewed as complementary to emissions cuts, rather than a replacement for them.

I would actually go further: Resorting to geoengineering cannot be viewed as anything other than a failure on our part. The problem we currently face is not just about the possible impact of rising sea levels and changing weather patterns. The more fundamental issue is our species’ mad dash to consume the energy and mineral resources produced by hundreds, if not thousands, of millions of years of geological activity in a mere century or two. Much of the impetus behind geoengineering seems to be an attempt to cling to what could be referred to as “business as abnormal,” and shows that we have yet to grasp that our economies and populations cannot grow forever on a planet with finite space, resources, and carrying capacity. Building a sustainable and carbon-neutral energy infrastructure is an important step toward reining in our more profligate tendencies and securing the long-term future of our civilization. The current flirtation with geoengineering may well prove to be a dangerous distraction from this goal, in terms of both money and resources.

The distraction could waste political capital, too. Looking beyond the scientific issues, the Royal Society’s report also points out that “the greatest challenges to the successful deployment of geoengineering may be the social, ethical, legal, and political issues associated with governance, rather than scientific and technical issues.” Any attempt at large-scale climate manipulation will have a global impact, and thus a globally binding legal framework will need to be agreed beforehand. Which allows me to close with another ironic thought: Any such agreement, and the sustained mustering of the political will required to negotiate it, is precisely what is required if we are serious about cutting our greenhouse gas emissions.  Investing our enthusiasm in the latter, rather than the former, would appear to offer a much better return for the same effort.

Originally published September 14, 2009

Tags climate geography multilateralism policy

Share this Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More


  • Ideas

    I Tried Almost Everything Else

    John Rinn, snowboarder, skateboarder, and “genomic origamist,” on why we should dumpster-dive in our genomes and the inspiration of a middle-distance runner.

  • Ideas

    Going, Going, Gone

    The second most common element in the universe is increasingly rare on Earth—except, for now, in America.

  • Ideas

    Earth-like Planets Aren’t Rare

    Renowned planetary scientist James Kasting on the odds of finding another Earth-like planet and the power of science fiction.

The Seed Salon

Video: conversations with leading scientists and thinkers on fundamental issues and ideas at the edge of science and culture.

Are We Beyond the Two Cultures?

Video: Seed revisits the questions C.P. Snow raised about science and the humanities 50 years by asking six great thinkers, Where are we now?

Saved by Science

Audio slideshow: Justine Cooper's large-format photographs of the collections behind the walls of the American Museum of Natural History.

The Universe in 2009

In 2009, we are celebrating curiosity and creativity with a dynamic look at the very best ideas that give us reason for optimism.

Revolutionary Minds
The Interpreters

In this installment of Revolutionary Minds, five people who use the new tools of science to educate, illuminate, and engage.

The Seed Design Series

Leading scientists, designers, and architects on ideas like the personal genome, brain visualization, generative architecture, and collective design.

The Seed State of Science

Seed examines the radical changes within science itself by assessing the evolving role of scientists and the shifting dimensions of scientific practice.

A Place for Science

On the trail of the haunts, homes, and posts of knowledge, from the laboratory to the field.


Witness the science. Stunning photographic portfolios from the pages of Seed magazine.

SEEDMAGAZINE.COM by Seed Media Group. ©2005-2015 Seed Media Group LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | Research Blogging | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM