From deforestation to the art of topiary, humans have a long history of altering their environments. But our environments, say scientists at Arizona State Univeristy, may also change us.

In a multi-year project called the “The North Desert Village Landscaping Experiment,” researchers transformed 24 identical family housing units on the Arizona State University campus in the Sonoran Desert, creating five mini-neighborhoods, each with a different landscape style. The multidisciplinary project, encompassing everything from sociology to ecology, allows scientists to observe how people’s behaviors and attitudes vary in response to different environmental characteristics.

“We think about how humans are always transforming the environment, whether we’re building new houses, or people in the rainforest are tearing down trees,” said ASU sociologist Scott Yabiku, one of the lead researchers on the project, which began in 2004. “But if we install different types of landscapes, will that change the way people think about their environment?”

The new landscapes are meant to represent those typically found in the Phoenix, Ariz. area, Yabiku said. For example, the “xeric” landscape contains low water-use plants, little grass, and a drip irrigation system, while the “mesic” is full of broadleaf trees that require flood irrigation. One neighborhood serves as an experimental control and remains unaltered, containing plants native to the desert.

After the landscapes were created in 2004, sociologists conducted preliminary interviews, asking residents to rate pictures of each style on a scale of one to four. They found people overwhelmingly preferred the greener views.

The results also showed landscape preference to be strongly correlated with gender: Women rated xeric and desert landscapes lower than men did. Researchers postulate that the difference in gender preference might be due to differences in labor responsibilities—such as yard work and childcare—between women and men.

The researchers fully expected these ratings to change during the course of the experiment, Yabiku said.

“We hypothesize that there will be an appreciation of landscapes now that people have been living in them,” Yabiku said. “So we expect these ratings of the desert and the xeric landscapes to increase over time.”

They also suspect that preferences are linked to factors like whether an individual recycles, or has the ability to identify birds and plants, as well as their attitudes about water issues.

The initial hypotheses being tested include whether ecological knowledge is higher in individuals who prefer native landscapes and whether more recreational activity occurs in more lush environments. 

Researchers are also analyzing how ecological factors, including microclimate and mammalian diversity, are affected by alterations in the landscape. Although not all the results are in, ecologists have already observed an increase in soil temperature during nighttime in landscapes with fewer plants. This supports the idea that surrounding a house with vegetation might lead to cooler climates, said Chris Martin, a biologist at ASU.

The study, which will continue until at least 2010, is a unique investigation into people’s social and ecological interests, which may sometimes be in conflict, said Scott Collins, a biologist at the University of New Mexico who is not involved in the project.

“Parents don’t like their kids going out and running into cactus thorn in their backyard,” Collins said. “So there are interesting contrasts between social needs or behavioral needs and ecological needs.”

Originally published August 30, 2006


Share this Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More


  • Ideas

    I Tried Almost Everything Else

    John Rinn, snowboarder, skateboarder, and “genomic origamist,” on why we should dumpster-dive in our genomes and the inspiration of a middle-distance runner.

  • Ideas

    Going, Going, Gone

    The second most common element in the universe is increasingly rare on Earth—except, for now, in America.

  • Ideas

    Earth-like Planets Aren’t Rare

    Renowned planetary scientist James Kasting on the odds of finding another Earth-like planet and the power of science fiction.

The Seed Salon

Video: conversations with leading scientists and thinkers on fundamental issues and ideas at the edge of science and culture.

Are We Beyond the Two Cultures?

Video: Seed revisits the questions C.P. Snow raised about science and the humanities 50 years by asking six great thinkers, Where are we now?

Saved by Science

Audio slideshow: Justine Cooper's large-format photographs of the collections behind the walls of the American Museum of Natural History.

The Universe in 2009

In 2009, we are celebrating curiosity and creativity with a dynamic look at the very best ideas that give us reason for optimism.

Revolutionary Minds
The Interpreters

In this installment of Revolutionary Minds, five people who use the new tools of science to educate, illuminate, and engage.

The Seed Design Series

Leading scientists, designers, and architects on ideas like the personal genome, brain visualization, generative architecture, and collective design.

The Seed State of Science

Seed examines the radical changes within science itself by assessing the evolving role of scientists and the shifting dimensions of scientific practice.

A Place for Science

On the trail of the haunts, homes, and posts of knowledge, from the laboratory to the field.


Witness the science. Stunning photographic portfolios from the pages of Seed magazine.

SEEDMAGAZINE.COM by Seed Media Group. ©2005-2015 Seed Media Group LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | Research Blogging | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM