How did a National Academies manifesto get science on the Bush administration's agenda?

stormwhitehouse.jpg Credit: Klaas Lingbeek-van Kranen

Several scientists probably did a double take when President Bush announced a plan to double funding for basic research over the next decade during January’s State of the Union address. In recent years, the Oval Office couch had been cold to government scientists suggesting that the President request more funds for research. Instead, a grim trend of neglect for science ensued, culminating last year in the National Institutes of Health choking down their first budget cut since 1970.

Insiders say New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman‘s The World is Flat, a 500-page treatise on the globalization of business, as well as a report from the National Academies, which landed on the president’s desk like a ton of uranium, has the White House suddenly taking cues from a liberal wonk, not to mention a bunch of scientists. The proposed reallocation of federal funds will benefit the National Science Foundation, the Department of Energy‘s Office of Science, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology, all while overall non-military spending is slated for reduction.

“I like and respect our president, but he’s a slow learner when it comes to this,” said, Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson, a Texas Democrat on the House Committee on Science.

One senior government official said that Friedman’s book provided Washington insiders and elected officials a much-needed lexicon with which to discuss America’s burgeoning competitiveness woes in the international scientific arena. The National Academies report, titled “Rising Above the Gathering Storm,” harnessed momentum from Friedman and pushed full speed ahead. Both documents have gained so much traction in Washington that David Goldston, chief of staff of the House Committee on Science, recently called this the “Year of Science.”

The National Academies report frequently reads like an ultimatum: Unless we bolster scientific research, it warns, “We can expect to lose our privileged position in the world,” as science and technology jobs go abroad. Its damning conclusion proclaims, “For the first time in generations, the nation’s children could face poorer prospects than their parents and grandparents did.”

According to a senior Congressional staff member, the current administration is renowned for ignoring academy reports, but John H. Marburger, III—Bush’s science adviser and director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy—said a strong case “came together” that persuaded the president to reemphasize research. “‘Gathering Storm’ had a significant impact,” Marburger said. “The president is grateful to the academies…and industry.”

As any veteran climate scientist knows, President Bush isn’t one to be swayed by a little doomsday prophesying, even (or rather, especially) from the science community. The difference, in this case, is that the National Academies of Science, which put together the report at the behest of Senators Lamar Alexander (R-TN) and Jeff Bingaman (D-NM), assembled a reporting committee that had a real shot of getting the president’s ear.

Alongside prominent scientists like Charles M. Vest, president emeritus of MIT, and three Nobel laureates—Steven Chu, Joshua Lederberg and Robert C. Richardson—the committee included captains of industry. The academies went outside their walls, appointing Norman R. Augustine, retired CEO of Lockheed Martin, to chair the 20-person committee that issued “Storm,” as the report is often referred to on Capitol Hill. (On other occassions, the report is affectionately called the “Augustine report.”)

In addition to having once worked with the government to create an arms export subsidy program worth $15.2 billion, Augustine remains a regular Republican donor and Bush confidante. Other committee members have similarly close ties: Craig Barrett, chairman of the board of the Intel Corporation, is married to Barbara Barrett, whom President Bush nominated to serve as secretary of the Air Force in 2003; Lee R. Raymond, recently retired CEO of the Exxon Mobil Corporation, is a major donor to the Republican Party.

These men, according to the Congressional staffer, have helped convince the administration that the flat world—one where the lowering of global political and technological barriers allows jobs and research opportunities to be given to the cheapest, qualified candidates—is influencing the way businesses are investing. As “Storm” notes, “a company can hire eight young, professional engineers in India for the cost of one in America.”

The concerns of business moguls got the report exposure that scientists and engineers haven’t been able to muster alone. Shortly after the report came out in October of last year, White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card gave it to every member of the US Chamber of Commerce as required reading.

On January 25th, Senators Alexander and Bingaman introduced the Protecting America’s Competitive Edge Act, or PACE Act, to Congress along with three of their fellow senators. The act seeks to implement many of Storm’s recommendations as legislation—including huge increases in basic research funding and the creation of a DARPA-like agency in the Department of Energy. The measure had 60 co-sponsors—30 Democrats and 30 Republicans—sign on within a week of the announcement.

Senator Bingaman, when introducing the PACE Act, called the emerging competition for science and technology jobs this generation’s Sputnik, a call to arms that the US is being outpaced in scientific endeavors. He added that the current climate is more threatening because there’s no physical object in the October sky to urge America to action.

In his book, Freidman wrote that “Boston, Bangalore and Beijing” have become “next-door neighbors overnight.” Standing behind the senators as they introduced the PACE Act was Norm Augustine. As he left the gathering, he stopped to emphasize the importance of the competitiveness effort. His crib sheet could not have been more obvious: “Baghdad, Bangalore and Bethesda are neighbors now,” he said.

Friedman’s book and “Storm” have not moved mountains only on Capitol Hill. Gaston Caperton, president of the College Board, the non-profit organization that administers the SAT and the Advanced Placement tests, cited “Storm” when he spoke in February about getting more students into AP math and science courses. “Storm” recommends a tripling by 2010 of the number of students who pass a math or science AP exam each year— approximately 700,000 students. The president, in turn, announced a plan to train 70,000 advanced placement math and science teachers over the next 10 years as part of his American Competitiveness Initiative, which he introduced during the State of the Union.

On February 23rd, the National Science Board released a report on the state of American science and engineering education. Echoing the one-two punch that’s taken Washington by, well, storm, a booklet accompanying the report begins with quotes from both The World is Flat and “Storm.” Hardly a science-related pamphlet has circulated at any of the recent budget meetings without a reference to the latter.

“Technology allows suppliers to be anywhere in the world,” Augustine said as he exited the January 25th Pace Act press conference. “Since the fall of communism, there have been three billion more capitalists,” and US companies want to feed them energy.

“We don’t only want to win the Nobel Prizes,” said Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), another of the act’s co-sponsors. “We want to win the market.”

Download podcast

Originally published March 15, 2006


Share this Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More


  • Ideas

    I Tried Almost Everything Else

    John Rinn, snowboarder, skateboarder, and “genomic origamist,” on why we should dumpster-dive in our genomes and the inspiration of a middle-distance runner.

  • Ideas

    Going, Going, Gone

    The second most common element in the universe is increasingly rare on Earth—except, for now, in America.

  • Ideas

    Earth-like Planets Aren’t Rare

    Renowned planetary scientist James Kasting on the odds of finding another Earth-like planet and the power of science fiction.

The Seed Salon

Video: conversations with leading scientists and thinkers on fundamental issues and ideas at the edge of science and culture.

Are We Beyond the Two Cultures?

Video: Seed revisits the questions C.P. Snow raised about science and the humanities 50 years by asking six great thinkers, Where are we now?

Saved by Science

Audio slideshow: Justine Cooper's large-format photographs of the collections behind the walls of the American Museum of Natural History.

The Universe in 2009

In 2009, we are celebrating curiosity and creativity with a dynamic look at the very best ideas that give us reason for optimism.

Revolutionary Minds
The Interpreters

In this installment of Revolutionary Minds, five people who use the new tools of science to educate, illuminate, and engage.

The Seed Design Series

Leading scientists, designers, and architects on ideas like the personal genome, brain visualization, generative architecture, and collective design.

The Seed State of Science

Seed examines the radical changes within science itself by assessing the evolving role of scientists and the shifting dimensions of scientific practice.

A Place for Science

On the trail of the haunts, homes, and posts of knowledge, from the laboratory to the field.


Witness the science. Stunning photographic portfolios from the pages of Seed magazine.

SEEDMAGAZINE.COM by Seed Media Group. ©2005-2015 Seed Media Group LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | Research Blogging | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM