Scientist says cells were switched without his knowledge.

hwang.jpg Hwang Woo-suk.  Credit: Chung Sung-Jun/Getty Images

SEOUL—Hwang Woo-suk defended his work today, saying he did, in fact, create 11 stem cell lines and claiming errors in a paper published in May in the journal Science were due to mismanagement, not fraud. He added that he can prove his ability to create patient-specific stem cells within the next ten days.

“I want to make it clear that we did make the stem cells and we do have the core technologies,” he said in a televised news conference. “If I am given the minimum time and support to re-enact the experiment, I’m sure I can achieve it–so that the core technology will not die away.”

Hwang admitted that six of his patient-specific stem cell lines were accidentally contaminated by a fungus in January and did not survive. He said he was able to revive two additional stem cell lines, form six additional lines and then form three more lines after the paper was submitted.

On November 18th, he said, he and his researchers found out these stem cells had been switched with embryonic stem cells against their knowledge. When they tested the cells, they found they were the same as non-patient-specific embryonic stem cells stored at MizMedi Hospital in Seoul. Hwang said he has asked law enforcement authorities for an investigation into the switch.

He also said he is unfreezing five patient-specific lines that were frozen early on in the experiment. Within ten days, he said, researchers will be able to determine whether they came from the donors and are, therefore, patient-specific. He also said he could create more patient-specific cells if given the time and funding.

Despite his claims, Hwang—a national hero in South Korea for being the first to clone a puppy and to extract stem cells from cloned human embryos—said he was withdrawing the paper from Science. He said duplicate photos of the same colony are incorrectly labeled as different lines in the paper, and he apologized for this “human error.”

“No matter what the reason, I feel responsible as head researcher for creating this huge controversy,” he said. “And I apologize.”

Hwang’s statement followed a media storm yesterday, when collaborator Roh Sung-il told the press that Hwang had admitted to falsifying data in the Science paper. Earlier this week, US stem cell expert Gerald Schatten of the University of Pittsburgh sent a letter to Science and to the other authors of the paper asking that his coauthor credit be retracted. He also recommended that the paper be withdrawn, citing ethical concerns and allegations he had received that elements of the report may have been falsified.

Before reports of fabrication emerged, Hwang had already faced a month of shame, beginning when he admitted to accepting egg donations from junior researchers, for which he apologized. Hwang was hospitalized for stress shortly after his admission; he returned to his laboratory on Friday morning.

Originally published December 16, 2005


Share this Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More


  • Ideas

    I Tried Almost Everything Else

    John Rinn, snowboarder, skateboarder, and “genomic origamist,” on why we should dumpster-dive in our genomes and the inspiration of a middle-distance runner.

  • Ideas

    Going, Going, Gone

    The second most common element in the universe is increasingly rare on Earth—except, for now, in America.

  • Ideas

    Earth-like Planets Aren’t Rare

    Renowned planetary scientist James Kasting on the odds of finding another Earth-like planet and the power of science fiction.

The Seed Salon

Video: conversations with leading scientists and thinkers on fundamental issues and ideas at the edge of science and culture.

Are We Beyond the Two Cultures?

Video: Seed revisits the questions C.P. Snow raised about science and the humanities 50 years by asking six great thinkers, Where are we now?

Saved by Science

Audio slideshow: Justine Cooper's large-format photographs of the collections behind the walls of the American Museum of Natural History.

The Universe in 2009

In 2009, we are celebrating curiosity and creativity with a dynamic look at the very best ideas that give us reason for optimism.

Revolutionary Minds
The Interpreters

In this installment of Revolutionary Minds, five people who use the new tools of science to educate, illuminate, and engage.

The Seed Design Series

Leading scientists, designers, and architects on ideas like the personal genome, brain visualization, generative architecture, and collective design.

The Seed State of Science

Seed examines the radical changes within science itself by assessing the evolving role of scientists and the shifting dimensions of scientific practice.

A Place for Science

On the trail of the haunts, homes, and posts of knowledge, from the laboratory to the field.


Witness the science. Stunning photographic portfolios from the pages of Seed magazine.

SEEDMAGAZINE.COM by Seed Media Group. ©2005-2015 Seed Media Group LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | Research Blogging | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM