Have songbirds undermined our understanding of what makes human language unique?

Most scientists agree that human language is qualitatively different from the forms of communication employed by other animals. However, when it comes to pinpointing just exactly what separates us from them, even linguists can get tongue-tied. It’s difficult to single out the one skill humans have, which explains our unique ability for language. After all, dogs understand their masters’ commands, whales sing in regional dialects and Koko the gorilla famously mastered rudimentary sign language.

Now scientists have trained songbirds to learn a certain type of grammar thought to be solely the province of humans. This discovery undermines the idea of our uniqueness, but it may help explain how we first evolved language.

“It may be that there is no magic bullet, no one thing that gives humans the capacity for language,” said Timothy Gentner, assistant professor of psychology at University of California, San Diego, who led the bird-training study. “We might just be superstars at enough different abilities that other animals can also do, but the combination gives us this unique ability for language.”

Gentner’s research, published in the April 27th issue of Nature, found that European starlings were capable of identifying songs that had been created using recursive “center-embedded grammar,” which MIT linguist Noam Chomsky and other eminent members of the field argue is a uniquely human ability.

“Center-embedded grammar was thought to be unique to humans before this,” said Gentner. “In fact, a study just asked this exact question using non-human primates, but couldn’t get the tamarins they were working with to learn it.”

Center-embedded grammar refers to the ability to insert more information into the middle of an expression. For example, the sentence, “The scientist studied birds” can be modified to read “The scientist, who had a degree in ornithology, studied birds.” In theory, this process could continue indefinitely and still produce grammatical sentences, although in practice the strings quickly become impractical.

To test for faculty with center-embedded grammar in starlings, Gentner and his colleagues created short songs of different “warbles” and “rattles.” After tens of thousands of trials with each bird over the course of several months, the researchers were able to teach them to identify complex grammatical songs.

Gentner sees the discovery as a valuable step in figuring out what allowed humans alone to develop language.

However, several respected linguists are more hesitant about the findings.

Ray Jackendoff, co-director of the Tufts University Center for Cognitive Studies, wonders whether the birds may be recognizing the songs simply by counting the number of warbles and rattles, rather than through any real capability for recursive grammar.

“The starlings learned to recognize structures made out of their own kind of sounds—I don’t think that’s a trivial accomplishment,” he said. “But I don’t think they’re necessarily learning a recursive grammar.”

Chomsky himself dismissed the implications for the study of language in less equivocal terms. Speaking to LiveScience, he said, “The article is based on a fundamental mathematical error,” and that it, “has nothing remotely to do with language; probably just with short-term memory.”

For his part, Gentner believes that even if the birds are identifying the songs by counting or some other means, they still demonstrate an ability previously believed to be unique to humans.

“It is the entry into this class of patterning rules that is remarkable and previously thought beyond the realm of non-human abilities,” he wrote via e-mail, responding to his study’s critics. “Some linguists may find this trivial, but that is a bit like saying apes use tools, but only the trivial kind that lack the sophistication of, for example, a tri-square or laser-level.”

Originally published May 1, 2006


Share this Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More


  • Ideas

    I Tried Almost Everything Else

    John Rinn, snowboarder, skateboarder, and “genomic origamist,” on why we should dumpster-dive in our genomes and the inspiration of a middle-distance runner.

  • Ideas

    Going, Going, Gone

    The second most common element in the universe is increasingly rare on Earth—except, for now, in America.

  • Ideas

    Earth-like Planets Aren’t Rare

    Renowned planetary scientist James Kasting on the odds of finding another Earth-like planet and the power of science fiction.

The Seed Salon

Video: conversations with leading scientists and thinkers on fundamental issues and ideas at the edge of science and culture.

Are We Beyond the Two Cultures?

Video: Seed revisits the questions C.P. Snow raised about science and the humanities 50 years by asking six great thinkers, Where are we now?

Saved by Science

Audio slideshow: Justine Cooper's large-format photographs of the collections behind the walls of the American Museum of Natural History.

The Universe in 2009

In 2009, we are celebrating curiosity and creativity with a dynamic look at the very best ideas that give us reason for optimism.

Revolutionary Minds
The Interpreters

In this installment of Revolutionary Minds, five people who use the new tools of science to educate, illuminate, and engage.

The Seed Design Series

Leading scientists, designers, and architects on ideas like the personal genome, brain visualization, generative architecture, and collective design.

The Seed State of Science

Seed examines the radical changes within science itself by assessing the evolving role of scientists and the shifting dimensions of scientific practice.

A Place for Science

On the trail of the haunts, homes, and posts of knowledge, from the laboratory to the field.


Witness the science. Stunning photographic portfolios from the pages of Seed magazine.

SEEDMAGAZINE.COM by Seed Media Group. ©2005-2015 Seed Media Group LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | Research Blogging | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM