New research finds egregious errors in the reporting of medical studies.

Watched the nightly local newscast much in the past few years? Perhaps you’ve heard that lemon juice can be used as a substitute for HIV medications, or that exercise can actually cause cancer. If your child has something caught in his throat, doctors recommend that you shove your fingers down their gullet to get it out. Oh, and be very sure not to perform self-examinations for breast cancer—unless you want to, in which case, doctors say: Go right ahead.

According to a study in the March issue of the American Journal of Managed Care, these often flat-out wrong and occasionally harmful stories were all broadcast under the guise of scientific fact on local television news programs

James Pribble, a lecturer at the University of Michigan Medical School, and lead author of the study, says that the influence of local news in America makes these errors and overstatements cause for significant concern. On these news shows, according to Pribble, inserting vague qualifiers like “scientists say” or “studies show” often substituted for thorough, fact-based reporting.

“Local television news is the number one source of people’s information, almost by a two to one margin,” Pribble said.

Pribble’s conclusions came from a random sampling of 122 stations from the top 200 local news stations in major American media markets. Kenneth Goldstein, a political scientist from the University of Wisconsin, had compiled the recorded broadcasts to study political advertising during the midterm elections in the fall of 2002. When he heard of Pribble’s plans to study coverage of health news, Goldstein offered up his broadcasts and became a co-author of the paper.

Doctors, as well as trained researchers, watched every single health story to assess their medical credibility, finding some seriously frightening broadcasts.

“The biggest, most glaring representative of that was a story about lemon juice’s use as contraceptive,” said Pribble, explaining that the original source for the story was an experiment in which the acidity of lemon juice killed a set of sperm cells in a Petri dish. The experimenters called for further research, but did not state anything conclusive about the properties of lemon juice.

“Local television news jumped on that and stated that as almost factual, saying it could be used to prevent HIV through sexual transmission,” Pribble said. “One station got the entire story wrong and actually reported that lemon juice could be used in lieu of your costly HIV medications.”

These false assertions were presented—in a vast majority of cases—without context, references or tips for finding more information, according to Pribble.

The study concluded that broadcasts also prioritized sensationalist public health stories, like the incidence of Ebola or West Nile Virus in southern states, over the coverage of more commonplace but more serious health risks like diabetes.

Despite the lethal potential of some of their mistakes, Goldstein was sympathetic towards local news reporters, claiming that health professionals carry some responsibility as well for accuracy in health reporting.

“It’s easy to focus on and criticize local news, but I think most of these reporters and most of these producers at local televisions are trying to do a good job,” he said.

Pribble and Goldstein’s study suggested two remedies for fixing misinformation in future broadcasts.

“One, there needs to be more continuous monitoring of what’s said about health on local news,” Goldstein said. “And two, I think doctors and health professionals and people who do political communication could work closer with local television news—do training sessions and that sort of thing—just to help them do a better job.”

Originally published March 14, 2006


Share this Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More


  • Ideas

    I Tried Almost Everything Else

    John Rinn, snowboarder, skateboarder, and “genomic origamist,” on why we should dumpster-dive in our genomes and the inspiration of a middle-distance runner.

  • Ideas

    Going, Going, Gone

    The second most common element in the universe is increasingly rare on Earth—except, for now, in America.

  • Ideas

    Earth-like Planets Aren’t Rare

    Renowned planetary scientist James Kasting on the odds of finding another Earth-like planet and the power of science fiction.

The Seed Salon

Video: conversations with leading scientists and thinkers on fundamental issues and ideas at the edge of science and culture.

Are We Beyond the Two Cultures?

Video: Seed revisits the questions C.P. Snow raised about science and the humanities 50 years by asking six great thinkers, Where are we now?

Saved by Science

Audio slideshow: Justine Cooper's large-format photographs of the collections behind the walls of the American Museum of Natural History.

The Universe in 2009

In 2009, we are celebrating curiosity and creativity with a dynamic look at the very best ideas that give us reason for optimism.

Revolutionary Minds
The Interpreters

In this installment of Revolutionary Minds, five people who use the new tools of science to educate, illuminate, and engage.

The Seed Design Series

Leading scientists, designers, and architects on ideas like the personal genome, brain visualization, generative architecture, and collective design.

The Seed State of Science

Seed examines the radical changes within science itself by assessing the evolving role of scientists and the shifting dimensions of scientific practice.

A Place for Science

On the trail of the haunts, homes, and posts of knowledge, from the laboratory to the field.


Witness the science. Stunning photographic portfolios from the pages of Seed magazine.

SEEDMAGAZINE.COM by Seed Media Group. ©2005-2015 Seed Media Group LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | Research Blogging | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM