Bush stymies a bill that would have allowed federal funding for research on embryonic stem cells, independent of when they were created.

Family members who have adopted frozen embryo babies applaud President Bush as he makes remarks, Wednesday, July 19, 2006, on embryonic stem cell research in the East Room. President Bush cast the first veto of his 5-year presidency Wednesday, saying legislation easing limits on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research “crosses a moral boundary” and is wrong.  Credit: AP Photo/Ron Edmonds

In May 2005, the House of Representatives passed HR 810, the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2005, by a margin of 238 to 194. Over a year later, on Tuesday, the Senate passed the bill—which calls for increased federal funding for embryonic stem cell research—by a vote of 63 to 37. 

On Wednesday, July 19, President George W. Bush exercised the first veto of his presidency to kill the measure. Neither the Senate nor the House has the two-thirds majority necessary to override Bush’s veto.

David Scadden, co-director of the Harvard Stem Cell Institute, said he congratulates Congress on their courage but also said he was displeased with the veto.

“It’s just so disappointing that [this is happening] despite the fact that every poll indicates that a majority of the population is in favor of this research,” he said. “And now that the majority of our elected representatives are in favor of this research, that President Bush is willing to respond to what is a minority opinion and hold back something that offers promise to literally millions of suffering Americans.”

Scadden added that even though Harvard receives a lot of private funding, the bill would have had a big impact on his work, allowing him to allocate all of his resources for all of his research instead of wasting time figuring out what was funded by whom and what he is allowed to use.

Scientists say embryonic stem cell research could one day lead to therapies for diseases such as Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s and juvenile diabetes.

In August 2001, President Bush set forth a policy that allowed for federal funding of research on human embryonic stem cells, but he limited federally supported research to lines already in existence at the time of his speech. He stated that 78 lines would be available, but only 22 of those lines were viable, only four are in common usage today and all are contaminated with mouse feeder cells. 

“By expanding the number of stem cell lines eligible for federal funding, one increases the likelihood that there will be a cell line maximally useful to a researcher interested in a specific research application,” said James Battey, chair of the NIH Stem Cell Task Force.

HR 810 would have expanded federally funded research to include stem cells derived from surplus embryos donated by fertility clinic patients. The bill even set out strict ethical guidelines for embryo donation: The embryos would have to be donated by in vitro fertilization clinics, where they were in excess of the patients’ needs. Further, it would have to be determined that the embryos in question would never be implanted in a woman and would otherwise be discarded. Finally, the patients would have to provide written, informed consent without receiving compensation for their donation.

“The President’s position isn’t based on science; it’s based on ethics,” said Admiral John Agwunobi, Assistant Secretary for Health at the Department of Health and Human Services, speaking on behalf of the principles underlying Bush’s policy as it stood before the vote on HR 810. “Across the many areas of research, we should always studiously avoid the harming of human life in order to treat human illness.”

Originally published July 20, 2006


Share this Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More


  • Ideas

    I Tried Almost Everything Else

    John Rinn, snowboarder, skateboarder, and “genomic origamist,” on why we should dumpster-dive in our genomes and the inspiration of a middle-distance runner.

  • Ideas

    Going, Going, Gone

    The second most common element in the universe is increasingly rare on Earth—except, for now, in America.

  • Ideas

    Earth-like Planets Aren’t Rare

    Renowned planetary scientist James Kasting on the odds of finding another Earth-like planet and the power of science fiction.

The Seed Salon

Video: conversations with leading scientists and thinkers on fundamental issues and ideas at the edge of science and culture.

Are We Beyond the Two Cultures?

Video: Seed revisits the questions C.P. Snow raised about science and the humanities 50 years by asking six great thinkers, Where are we now?

Saved by Science

Audio slideshow: Justine Cooper's large-format photographs of the collections behind the walls of the American Museum of Natural History.

The Universe in 2009

In 2009, we are celebrating curiosity and creativity with a dynamic look at the very best ideas that give us reason for optimism.

Revolutionary Minds
The Interpreters

In this installment of Revolutionary Minds, five people who use the new tools of science to educate, illuminate, and engage.

The Seed Design Series

Leading scientists, designers, and architects on ideas like the personal genome, brain visualization, generative architecture, and collective design.

The Seed State of Science

Seed examines the radical changes within science itself by assessing the evolving role of scientists and the shifting dimensions of scientific practice.

A Place for Science

On the trail of the haunts, homes, and posts of knowledge, from the laboratory to the field.


Witness the science. Stunning photographic portfolios from the pages of Seed magazine.

SEEDMAGAZINE.COM by Seed Media Group. ©2005-2015 Seed Media Group LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | Research Blogging | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM