The Great Climate Change Pay-Off

Road to Copenhagen / by Maywa Montenegro /

UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown has called on wealthy nations to cough up $100 billion for climate aid. But with no firm commitments, could money be the deal breaker in Copenhagen?

Page 2 of 2

To date, Europe has been by far the biggest financier of CDM projects. But with misgivings about its efficacy mounting, EU regulators have planned to dramatically scale back Europe’s purchase of CDM offsets. And in a bid to pressure large developing nations—specifically China, India, Mexico, and Brazil—to agree to firm emissions targets, the EU is threatening to make those nations ineligible for CDM after 2012. Europe’s chilling towards the CDM, however, hasn’t been met well by developing countries, nearly all of which have expressed a desire to expand and improve the CDM for the post-Kyoto period. China’s stakes in the CDM are higher than most—in 2008, its projects accounted for roughly 84 percent of all credits sold on the $6.5 billion primary CDM market—and has given no indication that it will agree to any kind of treaty that ends its participation.

With tensions escalating around the future of the CDM—who should participate, whether it should even continue to exist—the EU’s new offers for direct climate funding could help buffer anticipated disputes about north-south compensation. Or, they could just complicate them, given that the CDM focuses solely on mitigation while the EU proposals bundle together mitigation and adaptation. No one yet knows what the price tag on adaptation will be, but considering that measures could feasibly include things like moving Mumbai a few miles inland, it is likely to consume a good chunk of any funding budget. With these uncertainties hanging, how China reacts to the EU’s direct-payment plans will in part depend on whether it is offered as “instead of” or “in addition to” ongoing CDM activities. In his London speech, Brown tread lightly on this terrain, acknowledging that the CDM would continue, but also urging a need “to go beyond the current clean development mechanism” by introducing the larger developing nations to sector-wide emissions targets and hence the incentives of carbon trading.

It remains unclear how Europe’s new funding schemes will affect the ongoing CDM debate, and consequently, whether Brown’s plan is likely to win broad-based international support. Last week’s G8 climate forum, however, revealed just how steep the road ahead could be. Prior to the much-anticipated event—which was organized by US President Barack Obama in an effort to inject top-level momentum into stalled climate negotiations—Gordon Brown had phoned Obama, Prime Minister Wen Jiabao of China, and French President Nicolas Sarkozy to build support for his $100 billion plan. Yet the draft declaration released late Thursday afternoon was bland at best. It says that aid to the poorest and most vulnerable countries is essential but contains no specifics on a formula for contributions to such a fund or how the money should be spent. The only commitment in the declaration is a smaller, immediate payment to the most vulnerable countries—low-lying nations threatened by rising seas, African nations subject to drought, and poor nations that rely on wood for cooking—in the sum of $400 million per year.

It is clear that success in Copenhagen will depend on how far developed nations are prepared to go with their cumulative climate-financing efforts. But the gulf is wide between what China and other developing nations view as fair and just and what the developed nations do. The G77, a loose coalition of developing countries, has suggested that rich nations contribute 1 percent of their GDP—more than $143 billion from the US alone. Brown remains firm in his call for a global contribution of $100 billion. But $400 million—China not included—is the only amount on paper at the moment.

The Chinese have a saying, 有錢能使鬼推磨: “If you have money you can make the devil push your grind stone.” A looser interpretation is “money talks.” Everyone with a seat at the Copenhagen table is well versed in this language. Come December, those with a planetary agenda would do well to pipe up.

Originally published July 13, 2009

Page 2 of 2

Tags climate development gdp policy

Share this Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More


  • Ideas

    I Tried Almost Everything Else

    John Rinn, snowboarder, skateboarder, and “genomic origamist,” on why we should dumpster-dive in our genomes and the inspiration of a middle-distance runner.

  • Ideas

    Going, Going, Gone

    The second most common element in the universe is increasingly rare on Earth—except, for now, in America.

  • Ideas

    Earth-like Planets Aren’t Rare

    Renowned planetary scientist James Kasting on the odds of finding another Earth-like planet and the power of science fiction.

The Seed Salon

Video: conversations with leading scientists and thinkers on fundamental issues and ideas at the edge of science and culture.

Are We Beyond the Two Cultures?

Video: Seed revisits the questions C.P. Snow raised about science and the humanities 50 years by asking six great thinkers, Where are we now?

Saved by Science

Audio slideshow: Justine Cooper's large-format photographs of the collections behind the walls of the American Museum of Natural History.

The Universe in 2009

In 2009, we are celebrating curiosity and creativity with a dynamic look at the very best ideas that give us reason for optimism.

Revolutionary Minds
The Interpreters

In this installment of Revolutionary Minds, five people who use the new tools of science to educate, illuminate, and engage.

The Seed Design Series

Leading scientists, designers, and architects on ideas like the personal genome, brain visualization, generative architecture, and collective design.

The Seed State of Science

Seed examines the radical changes within science itself by assessing the evolving role of scientists and the shifting dimensions of scientific practice.

A Place for Science

On the trail of the haunts, homes, and posts of knowledge, from the laboratory to the field.


Witness the science. Stunning photographic portfolios from the pages of Seed magazine.

SEEDMAGAZINE.COM by Seed Media Group. ©2005-2015 Seed Media Group LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | Research Blogging | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM