PZ Myers on how the garden-variety caterpillar is revealing surprising information about the circumstances under which genetic traits actually put themselves forward.

Illustration by Alison Schroeer

In 1910 Thomas Hunt Morgan found a single white-eyed fly among the teeming thousands of normal red-eyed flies he raised in his lab. He nursed it to adulthood—legend has it that he kept the delicate new fly by his bedside until it was strong enough to breed—bred generations of new flies from it, and found that the white-eyed trait could be propagated in fly after fly. This is the canonical model for how new traits appear: A spontaneous mutation causes a new phenotype, natural (or in this case, artificial) selection can then do its work, and the trait spreads through the population. The genotype precedes the phenotype.

Can it work any other way? Can the phenotype appear, and be selected for, before a specific gene for the trait is present? It sounds heretical, and the idea is mildly controversial, but there is a process called genetic accommodation that provides a mechanism for novel phenotypes to precede a specific genotype.

First, let’s consider a specific recent example, some lovely work by Suzuki and Nijhout, as a concrete instance of the phenomenon. Then I’ll explain the mechanism behind this curious process.

Gardeners and entomologists are familiar with the hornworm, the impressively large caterpillar of the moth, Manduca. There are several species, and one, Manduca quinquemaculata, exhibits an interesting polyphenism: It has two possible forms, with the larva either turning entirely black if it is raised at cool temperatures (the better to absorb heat from the sun), or all green if raised at warmer temperatures (the better to hide in foliage). Another species, Manduca sexta, exhibits no such flexibility. The wild type is always green, no matter what the temperature, and a mutant form is always black, again without regard for temperature. Suzuki and Nijhout wondered if they could give M. sexta the polyphenic abilities of M. quinquemaculata and carried out a clever experiment in evolution in the laboratory.

Development is a plastic process in which organisms respond not just to a genetic program, but also interact with the environment. In particular, stress can trigger strong molecular responses to better enable cells and tissues to carry on; one common experimental stressor is heat shock. Raise the temperature of the developing organism enough to force it to struggle to cope, but not enough to seriously injure it, and sometimes surprising and unpredictable changes occur. Note that these changes are not to the genetic material, but to the developmental processes—the phenotype alone.

Warming the developing larvae of the always-green form of M. sexta to 42°C for a few hours has no effect on the animal’s color. The always-green form seems to be strongly stabilized and unresponsive to change. The same treatment given to the always-black form, though, triggers a wide range of responses: Some stay black, others turn green, others exhibit varying degrees of mottling and color. Variation, of course, is the raw material of evolution, which suggests the obvious experiment—let’s try selecting from this pool of variant forms.

So here’s the experiment: Take 300 black caterpillars and hit them with a toasty, uncomfortable heat shock of 42°C for six hours (this is not an outrageous temperature—it’s akin to a particularly hot subtropical summer day). Afterward, pull out the caterpillars that turn the brightest green, and raise them to adulthood. This is selection for those forms that most readily switch colors and are going to be the progenitors of a polyphenic line. Similarly, pull out the larvae that resist changing color and stay black—this will be the monophenic line. Repeat for generation after generation, always selecting the polyphenic line for the individuals most likely to change color, and the monophenic line for individuals most able to resist color changes. Of course, you must also set up another line, a control, in which the individuals selected for the next generation are picked randomly without consideration of their color.

The end result? Within seven generations the monophenic line had become resolutely black, and heat shock was completely ineffective in triggering a color switch. Conversely, the polyphenic line became more and more responsive, and by the 13th generation always produced caterpillars that would switch from black to green. The control line continued to produce larvae that responded with apparently random color changes to heat shock.

In a way, this is not surprising. Selection has repeatedly been shown to be remarkably effective at leading to an increase in the frequency of specific traits. But a few things are unusual. This particular trait was not visible in the original population, requiring an unusual environmental condition, the heat shock, to bring it out. The heat-shock-induced phenotype was also heritable—if it weren’t, the lines would have shown no change in the frequency of the selected phenotype and would have continued to look like the control lines. Finally, what we’re seeing here isn’t a gene producing a completely novel phenotype, but developmental variability being enhanced by environmental stress and subsequently becoming stabilized by evolving regulatory mechanisms.

Despite the apparent departure from the canonical view that a novel genetic variation must arise first to create a phenotypic novelty, genetic accommodation doesn’t really involve any new genetic mechanisms. What the process does is use variation in the environment to unmask a cryptic reservoir of invisible genetic information in a population, exposing it to the effects of natural selection. So in effect, the genotype was actually present before the phenotype was revealed. In a sense there is no controversy here or violation of neo-Darwinian principles. The phenomenon does emphasize two key ideas that are neglected when we try to simplify the concepts of evolution.

First, the phenotype, that critical aspect of the organism that is subject to selection, is a product of development…and development is inherently an ongoing process of interaction with the environment. The form of an organism is not hardwired into the genome; rather, it emerges via interactions between genes, between cells and tissues, between an organism and its surroundings. You cannot understand a single gene in isolation, but have to study it in the context of other alleles (the genetic background) and the history and conditions of its expression.

Second, a great deal of the genetic variation present in a population may be buffered by stabilizing developmental processes. It may be effectively invisible, completely neutral as far as selection goes. Populations can accumulate these variant genes at no significant cost, but when conditions change, they may then be deployed to field novel phenotypes that can provide new potential (and new liabilities) in evolution. Recent analyses of human genetic variation reveal that each of us differs from our unrelated fellows by approximately 3 million (out of 3 billion) nucleotides; most of these differences are neutral and offer no detectable selective advantage under common conditions. Who knows what potential differences lurk in our genome if we are exposed to unusual conditions?

Originally published March 15, 2007


Share this Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More


  • Ideas

    I Tried Almost Everything Else

    John Rinn, snowboarder, skateboarder, and “genomic origamist,” on why we should dumpster-dive in our genomes and the inspiration of a middle-distance runner.

  • Ideas

    Going, Going, Gone

    The second most common element in the universe is increasingly rare on Earth—except, for now, in America.

  • Ideas

    Earth-like Planets Aren’t Rare

    Renowned planetary scientist James Kasting on the odds of finding another Earth-like planet and the power of science fiction.

The Seed Salon

Video: conversations with leading scientists and thinkers on fundamental issues and ideas at the edge of science and culture.

Are We Beyond the Two Cultures?

Video: Seed revisits the questions C.P. Snow raised about science and the humanities 50 years by asking six great thinkers, Where are we now?

Saved by Science

Audio slideshow: Justine Cooper's large-format photographs of the collections behind the walls of the American Museum of Natural History.

The Universe in 2009

In 2009, we are celebrating curiosity and creativity with a dynamic look at the very best ideas that give us reason for optimism.

Revolutionary Minds
The Interpreters

In this installment of Revolutionary Minds, five people who use the new tools of science to educate, illuminate, and engage.

The Seed Design Series

Leading scientists, designers, and architects on ideas like the personal genome, brain visualization, generative architecture, and collective design.

The Seed State of Science

Seed examines the radical changes within science itself by assessing the evolving role of scientists and the shifting dimensions of scientific practice.

A Place for Science

On the trail of the haunts, homes, and posts of knowledge, from the laboratory to the field.


Witness the science. Stunning photographic portfolios from the pages of Seed magazine.

SEEDMAGAZINE.COM by Seed Media Group. ©2005-2015 Seed Media Group LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | Research Blogging | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM