Wooing Europe’s New Parliament

Europe / by Elizabeth Cline /

However little voters or the new MEPs care or know about science, the European Parliament controls billions in funding. The challenge for science is how to engage them.

Audio from London: The Royal Society's James Wilsdon on shaping science policy within the newly-configured European Parliament.
Download as mp3

Record low numbers voted in the European Union’s parliamentary elections last week and the center-right European People’s Party expanded its plurality in the European Parliament. In Eastern European countries, where voters should arguably be chomping at the bit for some democratic action, voter turnout was lowest, with only 19.64 percent in Slovakia, 28 percent in Slovenia and the Czech Republic, and just more than 36 percent in Hungary, substantially lower in each case than the turnout in the latest national elections. Some political analysts pegged voter apathy to the recession, but the turnout was only a few percentage points lower that the 45.5 percent who turned out to the polls for the last European election in 2004. The clear indication is that voters don’t understand the EU’s relevance to their lives, lack a clear sense of its powers, or just don’t care.

For those that care about science in Europe and abroad, there is an equal amount of head-scratching about what newly elected members of the European Parliament (MEPs) mean for research and development, environmental policy, energy use, stem cells, spaceflight, and more. These issues were scantly mentioned during the campaigns, and many of the center-right and fringe parties that gained in the election don’t have developed platforms on science. In the United Kingdom, Frank Swain of sciencepunk.com and Martin Robbins of layscience.net tried to fill part of that gap in The Guardian just days before the elections. The pair interviewed representatives from five political parties in the UK (UK Independence Party, Labor, the Conservatives, the Liberal Democrats, and the Greens) about their positions on environment, energy, climate change, open access, space, stem cell research, alternative medicine, genetically modified food and research, and chemical safety, then ran the responses on their blogs. The results were underwhelming.

Credit: Alibaba0

As James Wilsdon explains in this podcast, the big question for supporters of science is how much emphasis the newly elected Parliament will place “on science and research within a broader response to recession.” Another big event on the Parliament’s horizon is the Irish vote, due to be held by October of this year, to ratify the Lisbon Treaty, which would give the MEPs more power relative to the European Commission and the Council of Ministers. The new Parliament will also play a key role in shaping the EU’s new Framework Program for Research and Technological Development, the multi-billion-euro plan for research that is renegotiated every few years and will shape negotiations on an international agreement on global warming. However little either voters or MEPs care about science, the EU has an integral role in shaping science policy. The challenge will be in figuring out how science can engage the new MEPs.

Originally published June 12, 2009

Tags economics funding governance multilateralism policy politics

Share this Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More


  • Ideas

    I Tried Almost Everything Else

    John Rinn, snowboarder, skateboarder, and “genomic origamist,” on why we should dumpster-dive in our genomes and the inspiration of a middle-distance runner.

  • Ideas

    Going, Going, Gone

    The second most common element in the universe is increasingly rare on Earth—except, for now, in America.

  • Ideas

    Earth-like Planets Aren’t Rare

    Renowned planetary scientist James Kasting on the odds of finding another Earth-like planet and the power of science fiction.

The Seed Salon

Video: conversations with leading scientists and thinkers on fundamental issues and ideas at the edge of science and culture.

Are We Beyond the Two Cultures?

Video: Seed revisits the questions C.P. Snow raised about science and the humanities 50 years by asking six great thinkers, Where are we now?

Saved by Science

Audio slideshow: Justine Cooper's large-format photographs of the collections behind the walls of the American Museum of Natural History.

The Universe in 2009

In 2009, we are celebrating curiosity and creativity with a dynamic look at the very best ideas that give us reason for optimism.

Revolutionary Minds
The Interpreters

In this installment of Revolutionary Minds, five people who use the new tools of science to educate, illuminate, and engage.

The Seed Design Series

Leading scientists, designers, and architects on ideas like the personal genome, brain visualization, generative architecture, and collective design.

The Seed State of Science

Seed examines the radical changes within science itself by assessing the evolving role of scientists and the shifting dimensions of scientific practice.

A Place for Science

On the trail of the haunts, homes, and posts of knowledge, from the laboratory to the field.


Witness the science. Stunning photographic portfolios from the pages of Seed magazine.

SEEDMAGAZINE.COM by Seed Media Group. ©2005-2015 Seed Media Group LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | Research Blogging | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM